00-11-23
0700 Morning
routine. …..
Late this afternoon, John GARSTANG
approached me to discuss the subject
of the report that I had submitted
to Insp. LATHEM on the Burn Tests of
the insulation and end caps, and the
possibility of a criminal
involvement. Vic GERDEN had
raised the matter with him on the
phone this afternoon.
Apparently GERDEN is quite upset
with him for communicating too much
to me and for mentioning anything
about potential criminal matters.
He seems to feel that he should not
be sharing information.
GERDEN’s position seems to be that
the TSB is here to run the
investigation, collect the
information, and that is it.
There is to be no sharing of
information with us, as is evident
in GERDEN’s past actions regarding
report requests, and above all there
must be no mention whatsoever of
anything regarding a criminal act.
GERDEN seems to feel that if
something is blatantly illegal, then
it will be obvious and there is no
need to share information, as they
will not touch on the matter at all.
If something is questionably
criminal, then he doesn’t have to
tell us anything because he can use
the old fallback that he didn’t know
or realize that it was a criminal
matter. Therefore, all
information flow is in a one-way
direction. This certainly
seems to be the philosophy of the
TSB at their management levels, as
has been related to me on several
occasions from several TSB members.
Their reasoning for this is that if
it is any other way, they will not
get the cooperation of the aircraft
companies. That seems to me to
be a poor way to run an
investigation! He mentioned
that GERDEN would like some
assurance that I would not report on
anything further, and I told him
that I could not give that
assurance. So, John asked me
to be careful in quoting him, and to
discuss anything with him before
sending it forward. He isn’t
really worried about his management
as he is already in trouble with
them, especially because of Air
India, but he doesn’t really need
the extra flak. While the
above is not verbatim, it is a
paraphrase of what was discussed for
nearly 45 minutes.
But this has me wondering if I
should have sent the report. I
really didn’t expect LATHEM to
actually send a copy of the report
to GERDEN, but merely to question
him on it, preferably after he had
spoken to me on the matter. I
had warned LATHEM several times in
the past that I was on the edge here
as far as information collection and
should the TSB management learn just
how much I was collecting, they
might well shut me down completely
by ordering their people not to talk
to me. That is the reason why I did
not want my notes added daily to
E&R, as they would have access to
the updates. I really have to
question the rational of sending the
report to GERDEN. After all,
it dealt with a criminal side of the
investigation and that is something
that GERDEN does not handle nor does
he want to get involved in. So
why should he even get a copy?
To phone him and question him
regarding the matter, being careful
to protect the source, would seem to
have been more feasible. To do
what was done seems to me to be
inconsiderate of the position both
John and I are in here at the
hangar, to say the least. Of
course, the matter would definitely
come out at a later date during
criminal or civil litigation
disclosure, but that would be
several years down the road and most
of the players would have changed by
then, or hopefully the MOU will have
been amended. LATHEM told me
that he had to send all such reports
to GERDEN, but again, I question
that because this deals with a
criminal element of the
investigation. It gives the
appearance to me that our management
will go to no end to ensure that
this file does not involve any
criminal investigation.
John indicated that GERDEN has to
now address this matter to make sure
that it is covered, especially for
disclosure. Once he does that,
what will LATHEM do with the matter?
It will likely be some time before I
ever find out, as LATHEM’s memo of
00-11-03 received on 00-11-06
states:
“This
is a Transportation Safety Board
issue which is in the “still under
investigation” process, and there is
no identified requirement for you to
have any further involvement.”
It seems obvious that he did speak
with GERDEN on the matter before
writing the memo to me. My
position is that I acted on
something that I thought was a
problem, and I reported it to my
management as I was supposed to do.
If they then burn the source by
improper actions, then that becomes
their problem in that my sources
will dry up. But above all, it
will be reflected in the next file,
when it happens, as there will be
even less communications coming our
way. On the other hand, if
anyone in the TSB management thinks
that I owe him or her an allegiance
because they are reimbursing the
Force my costs here at the hangar
and by doing that it means they can
gag me, then they are very mistaken.
I feel this attitude was reflected
in the comment by GERDEN that I was
a mole. However, I suggested,
and we agreed that I would speak to
GERDEN about it this weekend when he
comes in. I will simply tell
him that I had been the one to raise
the criminal element of the subject
and that John had backed off as soon
as he realized where I was going
with it. This is what I wrote
and that is what happened. If
GERDEN takes a different slant on
it, then that’s just too bad.
John and I discussed this for about
¾ hour until 1830, and in the end,
in his usual manner he told me not
to worry about it, that things would
work themselves out in the end.