From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
01-11-14
…..
Don ENNS called to advise that my end-date
has tentatively now been extended to
01-12-14. It seems that Vic GERDEN is
sending a memo to Insp. LATHEM, and he is
endorsing it and passing it on to my new
boss (that may be the new Insp., and as far
as I know, he has not yet arrived from ‘B’
Div.) Also, GERDEN wants me on the
next FAA test, but is concerned about
travel. So, it looks as if I will be
adjusting my time off leading up to the
trip. Not a problem, so long as I can
get it.
Don also mentioned about the burn test.
He has been thinking about Rick LYON’s
suggestion of putting everything in the
frame and burning it. He would like to
carry it out, but John is hesitant.
The suggestion was that perhaps some frame
pieces could be suspended in the fire to see
what effect it would have on them. The
problem is that as a test, it is totally
slanted one way. The frame pieces
would be unfairly exposed to an excessive
amount of burning material, and there is no
heat sink effect to go with it. So, if
the metal does melt, then it tells us
nothing. If it doesn’t melt, then it
tells us a great deal, that something had to
have been added to generate even more heat
to create all the molten frames that we
have.
Don feels that there would be no support
from high up in the TSB for such a test.
I have put the reason for this point of view
forward to our people and have been shot
down, but Don agrees with me. That is
the TSB would lose the value of all of their
safety recommendations if this fire was
proven to be something other than an
accident. None of the companies would
spend the money, especially now post 9-11,
to undertake the safety recommendations if
it was shown that the fire had been of a
criminal origin. So, any test such as
this would have to be undertaken simply on
their own (Don & John) and suffer the
recriminations after. I don’t know if
they will undertake it. We shall see!
I don’t see a whole lot to lose by doing it.
If it were to come out without melting the
aluminium, it would be the only way to get
the matter resolved, as our Force will not
act unless the TSB tell them something is
wrong.
Don requested several of the set-up photos
for his trip report, so sending them off
this afternoon.
Then John called about the extension, and
about Sunday. They are to plan as if I
am going on the next FAA trip. No
major problems otherwise, except that he is
glad that I am working Sunday, as they do
not know where the boxes are for the IFEN
systems.
…..
Message in from Jim FOOT.
From: "Foot,
Jim" <Jim.Foot@tsb.gc.ca>
To:
"'tom.juby@ns.sympatico.ca'"
<tom.juby@ns.sympatico.ca>
Subject:
FedEx Package
Date:
Wed, 14 Nov 2001 13:04:13 -0500
Hi Tom,
Just to let
you know there will be a box of wires
heading your way to-day for the show and not
tell next Tuesday. Also, there will be a
second box of wires tomorrow, both to your
attention. I'll hand carry the copper beads.
As soon as I get the exhibit numbers
electronically, I'll email them to you.
Jim Foot
TSB Engineering, .....
So the molten beads will also be down.
Will have to do up exhibit movements for
them on Sunday when I meet up with Jim.
Later, another message was received from Jim
listing all of the exhibit numbers being
sent. The file is saved in today’s
email.
Also, checked my Force email to find that my
transfer notice back to Halifax FIS is out,
effective tomorrow, dated the 13th.
Nice that I was consulted about the matter!
But then, not unusual that I wasn’t! I
am continuing to work as though I have
another extension to 01-12-15. I still
have ten days (100 hrs) to take off, and
then it will take at least two days to move
my gear.
(Clarification:) Jim thought he
was joking by calling the meeting "the show
and not tell", but in reality they were
deceiving everyone by not disclosing the
truth about the AES results and the
magnesium issue. It's also interesting
that Don used the term "putting everything
in the frame". Dr. Lyon called for
1000 gm of metallized mylar, not
"everything".